Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a loss-making company: Sales comps and Analyst consensus.
ACCE opinionPAMT CORP Common Stock (PAMT)
Fair value
Not available
ACCE price target
$11.50
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $10.64 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus and Sales comps.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
36
out of 100
Analysts
0% buy
1 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 55.6x
1-year return
-7.5%
Dividend yield
0.00%
PAMT CORP Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
PAMT Corp runs a truckload carrier with flatbed and specialized equipment, serving industrial and construction shippers, and it also sells used trailers and trucks through its equipment sales business. The case for a closer look rests on revenue still growing 8.9% while the company works back toward profitability, though the current numbers are weak: operating margin is -6.7%, gross margin is 12.1%, and return on equity is -18.9%. The forward P/E of 55.6 against a trailing figure of zero shows the market is pricing a sharp earnings recovery that has not yet appeared in reported results. A $250M market cap and no index membership mean limited institutional coverage, so the first question is whether a freight upcycle can close the gap between that growth and the losses. The 38/100 score reflects those losses, so this is a name to examine only if the margin recovery thesis holds up under scrutiny.