2 models fit Atmos Energy Corporation Common Stock and they disagree: 0 of 2 land within 15% of the average.
Two or more of our models back this value.
Premium(i)
Valued as a utility: P/E comparison and EV/EBITDA comparison.
ACCE opinionAtmos Energy Corporation Common Stock (ATO)
Fair value (2 models)
$146
ACCE price target
$171
Rating
Overvalued
Horizon
12 months
Fair value published on 18 Oct 2026, 17:04 CEST; previously $147 since 11 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 18 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST; previously $195 since 12 May 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 18 Oct 2026, 17:04 CEST.
Price used: $172 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: P/E comparison and EV/EBITDA comparison.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
18.1% above
-15.3% to fair value
ACCE score
57
out of 100
Analysts
14% buy
14 covering
P/E
20.5x
forward 19.1x
1-year return
-2.0%
Dividend yield
2.30%
Atmos Energy Corporation Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Atmos Energy runs regulated natural gas distribution across Texas, the Midwest and the Mid-Atlantic, serving roughly 3 million customers through pipes it earns a rate-base return on. The advantage is the regulatory compact itself: allowed returns on a growing asset base, with pipeline replacement programs that convert capital spending into earnings without much exposure to gas prices or volumes. Revenue grew 4.8% and the forward multiple of 17.6 sits below the trailing 19.5, so the market is pricing in earnings growth without a rerating. The case for a closer look is that a 9.8% ROE and a 37.2% operating margin are the economics of a utility that can keep investing, and the open question is whether rate case outcomes keep pace with that capital plan. Given a 55 score and no index membership, the name needs a deeper pass on allowed returns and regulatory lag before anyone sizes it.