3 models fit Angi Inc. Class A Common Stock and they disagree: 0 of 3 land within 15% of the average.
Two or more of our models back this value.
Large discount(i)Bronze43
Valued as a mature, profitable company: Discounted cash flow, EV/EBITDA comparison, Graham number, and Dividend discount.
ACCE opinionAngi Inc. Class A Common Stock (ANGI)
Fair value (3 models)
$17.08
ACCE price target
$6.70
Rating
Undervalued
Horizon
12 months
Fair value published on 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST; previously $3.08 since 4 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 19 Oct 2026, 17:05 CEST.
Price used: $6.62 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Discounted cash flow, Dividend discount, EV/EBITDA comparison, and Graham number.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
61.2% below
+158.0% to fair value
ACCE score
39
out of 100
Analysts
25% buy
8 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 7.6x
1-year return
-53.5%
Dividend yield
0.00%
Angi Inc. Class A Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Angi runs one of the largest online marketplaces for home services, matching homeowners with local contractors for repairs, remodeling and maintenance through its Angi and HomeAdvisor brands. The business earns very high gross margins (95.7%) because it sells leads and memberships rather than doing the work, but revenue has been shrinking, down 10.9%, and the operating margin of 0.9% leaves almost nothing after overhead. Return on equity is negative at -26.3%, so the equity base is being eroded rather than compounded. The near-term question is whether cost cuts and a narrower focus on profitable lead categories can stabilize revenue, since that is what would turn the 8.1x forward earnings multiple from a value signal into a real opportunity. At a $251M market cap with a weak score of 37/100 and no index membership, this is a turnaround candidate that needs evidence of top-line stabilization before it merits deeper work.