Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a loss-making company: Analyst consensus.
ACCE opiniona.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. Common Stock (AKA)
Fair value (2 models)
Not available
ACCE price target
$10.30
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $10.55 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
27
out of 100
Analysts
50% buy
4 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 11.3x
1-year return
-20.5%
Dividend yield
0.00%
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
a.k.a. Brands sells apparel and accessories through its own DTC websites (Lulus, Culture Kings, Princess Polly and others) and a smaller wholesale business, selling mostly to younger women and streetwear customers. The core advantage is the 59.6% gross margin, which is high for apparel and shows the brands still command pricing power online. Against that, revenue is flat to slightly down (-0.3%), operating margin is barely positive at 0.7%, and ROE of -25.5% reflects accumulated losses, so the equity is thin relative to the business. The stock trades on a forward P/E of 11.3 on a market cap of about $112M, which is cheap only if management can convert the gross margin into operating profit; the score of 35/100 says the model doesn't yet see that happening. This is worth a deeper look only if you have a view on whether the DTC brands can return to growth without buying it with discounting.
⚠ Investor warnings · 3 flagsAI-assisted·How I use AI
high
Negative free cash flow
Free cash flow was $-633,000 while debt/equity sits at 2.17, so the balance sheet depends on borrowing rather than internally generated cash.
high
Earnings collapsing despite flat sales
Earnings fell 50.0% year over year on revenue down only 0.3%, and net margin is -4.4% with operating margin just +0.7%, signalling heavy cost pressure.
moderate
Weak returns on equity
ROE of -25.5% means shareholders' capital is being eroded, not compounded, which limits the appeal of the 35/100 ACCE score.
AI research notes
AI-assisted·How I use AIWritten Oct 15, 2026 · figures from 2026-06-30 · prices to Oct 23, 2026
Why it could do well
Revenue grew at an average of 22.7% a year over five years, a long record of expansion.
The latest quarterly earnings beat expectations, with earnings per share of -0.01 against -0.35 expected.
Analysts' mean price target of $19.75 sits 88.5% above the current $10.48 share price.
Why it could disappoint
Revenue is essentially flat, falling 0.3% over the past year after years of rapid growth.
The company lost money over the last twelve months, with free cash flow of -$633,000 and a net margin of -4.4%.
Debt is 2.17 times equity, and the share count rose 1.5%, diluting existing holders.
Each chip shows the exact figure and where it comes from. A claim without a source is not published.
Next results
Nov 4, 2026
We update the fair value about 2 days after the results, once the new figures are filed.Add to calendarGoogle
Walk me through this stock
Plain-English pros, cons, and what to watch. Pro feature.
PRO
Ask ACCE
Valuation
INVESTOR
Where AKA's valuation models land
Price
$10.55
Model fair valueConfidence: low
about $19.75
Model
Fair value
Upside
Analyst consensus
Create a free account: 5 full stock pages a month, no card.
See what each model says, the assumptions behind it, the bad, normal and good cases, and why the fair value changed.
Quality
INVESTOR
Quality and conviction INVESTOR FEATURE
The full quality picture: a reason under every score, how the scores moved, and the conviction breakdown.
+A plain reason under every score
+Conviction breakdown and growth / value / quality / momentum scores