Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a pre-revenue company: Analyst consensus.
ACCE opinionRevolution Medicines Inc. Common Stock (RVMD)
Fair value
Not available
ACCE price target
$210
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 20 Sept 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $187 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
36
out of 100
Analysts
96% buy
24 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 0.0x
1-year return
+249.9%
Dividend yield
0.00%
Revolution Medicines Inc. Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Revolution Medicines is a clinical-stage oncology company developing RAS-pathway inhibitors, the most notable being daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), a pan-RAS(ON) inhibitor aimed at tumors driven by KRAS mutations such as pancreatic cancer, where RAS has long been considered undruggable. The structural case rests on that scientific position: few competitors have a pan-RAS program advanced this far, and a validated RAS inhibitor would open a large, poorly served patient population. The near-term catalysts are the readouts and regulatory interactions from the pivotal programs, which will determine whether the platform converts into a commercial product. The data here show almost no revenue (the reported -95.2% revenue growth and a gross margin figure that is not meaningful reflect a tiny, collaboration-driven top line against heavy R&D spend), an ROE of -79.1%, and no earnings to value, so the investment case is entirely a bet on clinical and regulatory outcomes at a $41.6B market capitalization. The composite score of 36/100 and the absence of index membership reflect that risk profile, so this merits a deeper look only if the reader is prepared to underwrite binary trial outcomes.