4 models fit Graphic Packaging Holding Company and they disagree: 0 of 4 land within 15% of the average.
Two or more of our models back this value.
Large discount(i)Bronze59
Valued as a mature, profitable company: Discounted cash flow, P/E comparison, EV/EBITDA comparison, Graham number, and Dividend discount.
ACCE opinionGraphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK)
Fair value (4 models)
$14.40
ACCE price target
$8.40
Rating
Undervalued
Horizon
12 months
Fair value published on 20 Oct 2026, 15:04 CEST; previously $14.97 since 11 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 11 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 20 Oct 2026, 15:04 CEST.
Price used: $8.77 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: P/E comparison, EV/EBITDA comparison, Graham number, and Dividend discount.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
39.1% below
+64.2% to fair value
ACCE score
37
out of 100
Analysts
17% buy
12 covering
P/E
13.7x
forward 8.3x
1-year return
-50.4%
Dividend yield
5.24%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Graphic Packaging makes folding cartons, coated paperboard and paperboard-based beverage cartons, supplying consumer packaged goods and food producers. The case for a closer look rests on its scale in paperboard and the cash-generative nature of a business that is largely a price-taker on input costs, though current economics are thin: a 4.5% operating margin and 15.5% gross margin leave little room for error. Revenue is shrinking slightly, down 0.7%, and a 6.0% ROE reflects a capital-heavy base earning modest returns. The shares trade at 8.3 times forward earnings against 13.2 times trailing, which implies the market expects earnings to recover, so the thesis hinges on whether margins rebuild from here. The score of 35/100 and absence from any major index reflect that skepticism, so this is a turnaround-dependent name that needs margin evidence before it earns more of our time.