Vitrolife makes intraocular lenses, IVF culture media and embryo-culture and imaging tools for fertility clinics, and its Stockholm-listed shares carry a forward P/E of 21.4 on a 59.2% gross margin and a 23.1% operating margin. Those margins are the core of the case: the consumables and implants that clinics reorder every cycle, and the lenses that get implanted once and then sit in patients for life, give it recurring, high-margin revenue that few medtech peers match. Revenue is currently shrinking, down 1.6%, so the question for a PM is whether that softness is cyclical in fertility volumes or a sign that the company's growth engine has stalled. The reported ROE of -46.5% is a distortion from a balance sheet that has absorbed large write-downs, and it should not be read as operating losses given the healthy operating margin. At 13.9 billion SEK market cap, with no index membership, the name sits outside most mainstream allocation models, which can mean the valuation reflects the revenue decline more than the franchise quality. Worth a deeper look on whether IVF demand and lens market share have bottomed.
Plain-English pros, cons, and what to watch. Pro feature.
See what each model says, the assumptions behind it, the bad, normal and good cases, and why the fair value changed.
The full quality picture: a reason under every score, how the scores moved, and the conviction breakdown.
The full analyst picture: the price-target distribution against the current price, forward consensus estimates, and how ACCE's own models compare.
Trades are only made public after a delay. We show the delay so you know how old the news is.
Follow the informed money: 13F position changes, insider and Congress trades, and 13D activist filings.
| Date | Type | New | Previous | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:04 CEST | Rating | Fairly valued | first publication | kr 103 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:04 CEST | Fair value | kr 111 | first publication | kr 103 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:53 CEST | ACCE price target | kr 106 | first publication | kr 103 |
Answered from Vitrolife AB (publ) fundamentals + recent valuations. Every number shows its source and date.
| Company | Price | Fair value | vs fair value | P/E | ROE | Quality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VITR.ST Vitrolife AB (publ) | kr 108.80 | kr 111 | 2% below | - | -46.5% | 56 | 39 |
| NOLA-B.ST Nolato AB (publ) | kr 56.10 | kr 42 | 34% above | 20.8x | 13.1% | 64 | 51 |
| EKTA-B.ST Elekta AB (publ) | kr 56.30 | kr 51 | 10% above | - | -4.3% | 39 | 51 |
| GN.CO GN Store Nord | kr 108.45 | kr 102 | 6% above | - | 2.1% | 37 | 46 |
| MCAP.ST MedCap AB (publ) | kr 546.00 | kr 385 | 42% above | 34.1x | 16.4% | 68 | 67 |
| AMBU-B.CO Ambu A/S | kr 79.60 | - | - | - | 0.0% | 50 | 37 |
| XVIVO.ST Xvivo Perfusion AB (publ) | kr 223.40 | kr 78 | 185% above | 73.0x | 4.1% | 66 | 57 |
Where VITR.ST ranks against its sector peers on each metric.