Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a loss-making company: Sales comps and Analyst consensus.
ACCE opinionTwist Bioscience Corporation Common Stock (TWST)
Fair value
Not available
ACCE price target
$130
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 10 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $140 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus and Sales comps.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
51
out of 100
Analysts
69% buy
13 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 0.0x
1-year return
+339.6%
Dividend yield
0.00%
Twist Bioscience Corporation Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Twist Bioscience makes synthetic DNA, including gene fragments, oligo pools and clonal genes, sold to pharma, biotech and academic labs that need custom sequences for drug discovery, antibody work and synthetic biology. Its moat is process know-how in silicon-based DNA synthesis, which has let it keep gross margins around 52% even as it scales, a rare combination in a sector where most tools businesses struggle to hold margins. Revenue growth of 23.2% is the number to watch, since the thesis rests on operating leverage: the company still runs an operating margin of -30.6%, so each incremental dollar of sales needs to fall through faster than fixed costs grow. The score of 51/100 and the absence from any index tell you the market is not yet paying for that leverage, which is why it deserves a look if you think the margin path is credible. The key debate is whether DNA synthesis demand is growing fast enough, and whether the cash burn implied by a -29.6% return on equity is funded long enough for that margin story to play out.