Only one of our models could value this stock with confidence, so use it as a guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a growth company: Discounted cash flow.
ACCE opinionRoblox Corporation Class A Common Stock (RBLX)
Fair value
Not available
ACCE price target
$47.00
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 21 Sept 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $52.89 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Discounted cash flow.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
37
out of 100
Analysts
50% buy
34 covering
1-year return
-59.1%
Dividend yield
0.00%
Roblox Corporation Class A Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Roblox runs a user-generated 3D platform where creators build games on its Roblox Studio tools and earn through its Robux virtual currency, with the bulk of revenue coming from in-experience purchases by its large base of players. Its structural advantage is the network effect of a creator economy: more developers attract more players, which draws in more creators, and the company keeps a share of every transaction. Revenue growth of 35.9% is the headline strength, but the business is still loss-making, with a -13.3% operating margin and a 25.7% gross margin, and the -432.3% ROE reflects a thin equity base rather than a usable return on capital. With no P/E on current earnings and no index membership, the stock is priced on growth and the path to margin expansion, not on profit. The composite score of 31/100 says the quantitative profile is weak, so the case rests on whether operating leverage arrives as revenue scales. That is worth a deeper look only if the reader is comfortable underwriting that margin turn.