Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Valued as a loss-making company: Analyst consensus.
ACCE opinionGoPro Inc. Class A Common Stock (GPRO)
Fair value (2 models)
Not available
ACCE price target
$1.10
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $1.01 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
29
out of 100
Analysts
0% buy
1 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 6.6x
1-year return
-53.9%
Dividend yield
0.00%
GoPro Inc. Class A Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
GoPro makes action cameras, drones, and the Karma and Max 360 camera lines, and it sells them mostly through retail and its own app and subscription ecosystem. The case for a deeper look rests on a shrinking but still profitable-at-gross-level hardware franchise: gross margin is 27.7%, and the question is whether cost cuts can bring operating margin, now at -34.5%, back toward breakeven before the revenue decline runs out. Revenue growth is -31.3%, and the stock trades at a forward P/E of 6.6, so the market is pricing in continued contraction rather than a recovery. ROE of -497.1% reflects a small equity base and recent losses rather than anything a reader can take at face value, which makes the balance sheet and cash burn the first things to check. Index membership is none, the score is 38/100, and the thesis hinges on whether the subscription and product-cycle catalysts can stabilize sales before cash runs short.