2 models fit Alexander's Inc. Common Stock and they disagree: 0 of 2 land within 15% of the average. The price is above every model.
Two or more of our models back this value.
Premium(i)Bronze53
Valued as a REIT (property company): Price to FFO, Dividend discount, and EV/EBITDA comparison.
ACCE opinionAlexander's Inc. Common Stock (ALX)
Fair value (2 models)
$201
ACCE price target
$215
Rating
Overvalued
Horizon
12 months
Fair value published on 19 Oct 2026, 17:05 CEST; previously $197 since 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 12 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 19 Oct 2026, 17:05 CEST.
Price used: $248 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Dividend discount and Price to FFO.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
23.3% above
-18.9% to fair value
ACCE score
66
out of 100
Analysts
0% buy
1 covering
P/E
7.5x
forward 19.1x
1-year return
+7.2%
Dividend yield
7.28%
Alexander's Inc. Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Alexander's owns a small portfolio of trophy retail properties in the New York metro, anchored by its Bloomingdale's store at 59th Street and Vornado-style Manhattan urban assets rather than the broad mall base most retail REITs hold. The moat is scarcity: few Manhattan flagship sites can be replicated, and the company's operating margin of 30.1% and gross margin of 48.5% reflect rents from tenants with little alternative. Revenue growth of 6.1% is modest, but the trailing P/E of 7.2 against a forward P/E of 35.6 signals that reported earnings are being depressed by a one-off or by a sharp expected change in the earnings base, so the forward figure needs to be reconciled before anyone leans on the cheap trailing multiple. The 92.0% ROE is inflated by a small equity base and should not be read as operating quality on its own. At a 1.2B market cap with no index membership, the name is under-followed, which is worth a deeper look mainly to establish what drives the gap between trailing and forward earnings and whether the Manhattan asset base can sustain its rent roll.