Fair value published on 20 Oct 2026, 15:04 CEST; previously $11.46 since 16 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 11 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 20 Oct 2026, 15:04 CEST.
Price used: $12.22 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Discounted cash flow and P/E comparison.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
4.2% above
-4.0% to fair value
ACCE score
42
out of 100
Analysts
82% buy
11 covering
P/E
0.0x
forward 26.6x
1-year return
-29.1%
Dividend yield
1.99%
TransAlta Corporation Ordinary Shares in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
TransAlta is an independent power producer whose portfolio mixes Alberta coal and gas generation with a growing set of wind, solar and hydro assets, plus a energy marketing and trading arm that sells power to industrial and utility customers. Its structural angle is the Alberta market, where it runs a large share of the province's dispatchable capacity, and the coal-to-gas and renewables conversion gives it a path to lower-carbon earnings that its peers in the province are still working through. Revenue grew 12.5% in the latest year, and operating margin of 33.3% suggests the contracted and merchant fleet is earning well, though a negative 1.4% ROE and a trailing P/E of zero show that reported earnings have not yet caught up with that operating strength. The forward P/E of 26.6 means the market is pricing in a meaningful earnings recovery, so the question for a PM is whether the conversion timeline and Alberta power pricing justify that gap. The score of 42/100 and absence from any major index argue for treating this as a deeper-look candidate rather than a conviction position.