Built from weaker models, sales multiples or analyst targets, so treat it as a rough guide.
Not used by alerts or posts.
Treated as a REIT (property company). None of the usual models had enough data, so this uses Analyst consensus and Net asset value instead.
ACCE opinionHudson Pacific Properties Inc. Common Stock (HPP)
Fair value
Not available
ACCE price target
$11.00
Rating
Not rated
Horizon
12 months
ACCE price target published on 20 Oct 2026, 02:20 CEST; previously $11.60 since 15 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Price used: $11.00 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 22:00 CEST.
Models: Analyst consensus and Net asset value.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
ACCE score
39
out of 100
Analysts
42% buy
12 covering
1-year return
-38.9%
Dividend yield
0.00%
Hudson Pacific Properties Inc. Common Stock in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Hudson Pacific Properties owns and operates office and media properties concentrated in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle and Hollywood, with its studio and production campus being the most distinctive part of the portfolio. The core structural question is whether a 6.3x forward multiple on a REIT with negative operating margin (-5.9%), a -17.3% ROE and revenue shrinking 1.3% is pricing in the trough or a permanent impairment of West Coast office demand. The 49.2% gross margin shows the property-level economics are still working, so the debate sits below the gross line, in leverage, occupancy and refinancing costs that the data here does not break out. The score of 43/100 and absence from any index reflect that the market has not yet rewarded the name. This is worth a deeper look only if the work can show occupancy and lease rollover trends by market, and a clear path through the debt maturity schedule.