4 models fit Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua and they disagree: 1 of 4 land within 15% of the average.
Two or more of our models back this value.
Discount(i)Silver66
Valued as a mature, profitable company: Discounted cash flow, P/E comparison, EV/EBITDA comparison, and Graham number.
ACCE opinionGrupo Cementos de Chihuahua (GCC.MX)
Fair value (4 models)
MXN 229
ACCE price target
MXN 198
Rating
Undervalued
Horizon
12 months
Fair value published on 18 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
ACCE price target published on 17 Oct 2026, 00:00 CEST.
Rating published on 24 Oct 2026, 17:04 CEST.
Price used: MXN 178 at the close on 23 Oct 2026, 23:00 CEST.
Models: Discounted cash flow, EV/EBITDA comparison, Graham number, and P/E comparison.
Fair value: the average of the applicable valuation models (discounted cash flow, multiples, residual income, dividend discount, shareholder yield), each run on the latest financial statements and the market price shown. Opinion columns (fair value, target, rating) are shown apart from the data. Full methodology: acceinvestments.com/data/how-we-value-stocks
Conflicts of interest: The author holds no personal position in this security. General statement
Produced by ACCE Investments (acceinvestments.com)
Data
Price vs fair value
22.5% below
+29.0% to fair value
ACCE score
62
out of 100
P/E
10.5x
forward 11.4x
1-year return
+5.3%
Dividend yield
0.06%
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua in four questions
Plain answers, details below
Free accounts get 5 full stock pages a month, including the four answers.
Overview
ACCE thesis
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua is a Mexican cement and aggregates producer that also sells ready-mix concrete and lime, with a US footprint that adds exposure beyond its home market. At 10.6x trailing and 9.1x forward earnings on a 58.7B MXN market cap, the stock is priced well below where a cyclical building-materials business with a regional moat would normally trade, which makes it worth a look. The data we have does not include revenue growth, margins or ROE, so the thesis rests on valuation and the business model rather than on reported operating momentum, and those figures need pulling before any position is sized. The forward multiple sitting below the trailing one implies consensus expects earnings to rise, but the size and source of that expected lift is the first thing to verify. The name also has no index membership in the data, so liquidity and float should be checked as part of the deeper review.