← Toutes les actions

META vs TMUS

Meta Platforms Inc. Class A Common Stock vs T-Mobile US Inc. Common Stock. Scores ACCE, valorisation, rentabilité et croissance côte à côte.

Scores ACCE
META
TMUS
Score composite
Sur 100
66
54
Croissance
52
40
Valeur
48
83
Qualité
100
75
Momentum
63
17
Valorisation
META
TMUS
Cours
741,25
165,27
Capitalisation
1,70 Bn
180,40 Md
PER glissant
25,07
17,61
PER prévisionnel
19,72
11,92
VE / EBITDA
15,30
9,21
Rendement du dividende
0,3 %
2,5 %
Rentabilité
META
TMUS
ROE
29,8 %
18,0 %
Marge nette
29,8 %
11,5 %
Dette / capitaux propres
0,28
1,46
Flux de trésorerie disponible
46,11 Md
18,00 Md
Croissance
META
TMUS
Croissance du chiffre d'affaires (sur 1 an)
28,0 %
7,9 %
Croissance des bénéfices (sur 1 an)
-13,4 %
5,3 %
Objectif des analystes
755,28
243,38
Verdict ACCE

$META vs $TMUS — META Wins on Quality, TMUS on Value

$META is the stronger business; $TMUS is the cheaper stock. The edge goes to $META.

$META's fundamentals are exceptional: revenue grew 33.1% year-over-year, earnings surged 62.4%, ROE sits at 32.9%, and net margin is 32.8% — all reflected in a perfect Growth and Quality score of 100/100 each. Its ACCE composite of 72/100 dwarfs $TMUS's 53/100. The analyst consensus target of $827.91 implies significant upside from $666.29.

The catch: $META's 6-model fair value of $566.77 puts it 14.9% above intrinsic value at current prices, and its 1-year return of -8.4% reflects that premium compression risk.

$TMUS tells a different story. Its 6-model fair value of $232.37 sits 25.1% above its $185.81 price — genuine margin of safety. FCF yield of 9.2% dwarfs META's 2.9%, and a 2.2% dividend adds income. But earnings fell 12.0% YoY, net margin is just 11.7%, and D/E of 1.46 signals a leveraged balance sheet.

Winner: $META. The growth trajectory and quality metrics justify the premium for long-term compounders. $TMUS suits income-focused, value-oriented mandates.

Voir l'analyse complète