← All stocks

PG vs WMT

Procter & Gamble Company (The) Common Stock vs Walmart Inc. Common Stock. Side-by-side ACCE scores, valuation, profitability, and growth.

ACCE scores
PG
WMT
Composite score
Out of 100
53
39
Growth
19
28
Value
59
36
Quality
85
58
Momentum
47
32
Valuation
PG
WMT
Price
146.39
106.73
Market cap
340.02B
849.37B
Trailing P/E
22.11
38.67
Forward P/E
20.96
36.63
EV / EBITDA
14.99
19.44
Dividend yield
2.9%
0.9%
Profitability
PG
WMT
ROE
30.3%
22.3%
Net margin
18.4%
3.0%
Debt / equity
0.63
0.45
Free cash flow
15.15B
14.92B
Growth
PG
WMT
Revenue growth (YoY)
1.5%
5.9%
Earnings growth (YoY)
-15.5%
-9.1%
Analyst target
160.61
127.42
ACCE verdict

$PG wins this comparison, though neither stock looks cheap right now.

Valuation is the clearest gap. $WMT trades at a trailing P/E of 38.3 and an EV/EBITDA of 19.27, while $PG sits at 21.9x earnings and 14.66x EBITDA. More striking: ACCE's 6-model fair value puts $WMT at $47.11, implying 56.0% downside from its current $107.15. $PG's fair value of $115.56 suggests 20.4% downside from $145.27, which is still a caution flag, but far less extreme.

Quality separates them further. $PG scores 85/100 on quality versus $WMT's 58. That shows up in the fundamentals: $PG's net margin is 18.4% against $WMT's 3.0%, and $PG's ROE of 30.3% beats $WMT's 22.3%. The 3.0% dividend yield on $PG also dwarfs $WMT's 0.9%, giving shareholders something tangible while they wait.

Neither company is growing earnings right now. $PG's earnings fell 15.5% year-over-year, $WMT's dropped 9.1%. $WMT's 5.9% revenue growth is the better top-line story, but it doesn't justify a valuation premium this wide over a business with six times the net margin.

$PG is the pick: better quality, better value, better income.

See full analysis