← All stocks

META vs TMUS

Meta Platforms Inc. Class A Common Stock vs T-Mobile US Inc. Common Stock. Side-by-side ACCE scores, valuation, profitability, and growth.

ACCE scores
META
TMUS
Composite score
Out of 100
66
54
Growth
52
40
Value
48
83
Quality
100
75
Momentum
63
17
Valuation
META
TMUS
Price
741.25
165.27
Market cap
1.70T
180.40B
Trailing P/E
25.07
17.61
Forward P/E
19.72
11.92
EV / EBITDA
15.30
9.21
Dividend yield
0.3%
2.5%
Profitability
META
TMUS
ROE
29.8%
18.0%
Net margin
29.8%
11.5%
Debt / equity
0.28
1.46
Free cash flow
46.11B
18.00B
Growth
META
TMUS
Revenue growth (YoY)
28.0%
7.9%
Earnings growth (YoY)
-13.4%
5.3%
Analyst target
755.28
243.38
ACCE verdict

$META vs $TMUS — META Wins on Quality, TMUS on Value

$META is the stronger business; $TMUS is the cheaper stock. The edge goes to $META.

$META's fundamentals are exceptional: revenue grew 33.1% year-over-year, earnings surged 62.4%, ROE sits at 32.9%, and net margin is 32.8% — all reflected in a perfect Growth and Quality score of 100/100 each. Its ACCE composite of 72/100 dwarfs $TMUS's 53/100. The analyst consensus target of $827.91 implies significant upside from $666.29.

The catch: $META's 6-model fair value of $566.77 puts it 14.9% above intrinsic value at current prices, and its 1-year return of -8.4% reflects that premium compression risk.

$TMUS tells a different story. Its 6-model fair value of $232.37 sits 25.1% above its $185.81 price — genuine margin of safety. FCF yield of 9.2% dwarfs META's 2.9%, and a 2.2% dividend adds income. But earnings fell 12.0% YoY, net margin is just 11.7%, and D/E of 1.46 signals a leveraged balance sheet.

Winner: $META. The growth trajectory and quality metrics justify the premium for long-term compounders. $TMUS suits income-focused, value-oriented mandates.

See full analysis