← All Posts
Ticker UpdateTuesday, August 11, 2026

$BAM ACCE Score Jumps 12 Points to 72 — What Drove It

Brookfield Asset Management's ACCE composite score rose from 60 to 72. Here's what the subscore breakdown tells us about the move — and the risks still present.

Adrien Chantreuil
Adrien Chantreuil
Founder, ACCE Investments

What changed

$BAM just recorded a 12-point jump in its ACCE composite score, moving from 60 to 72 out of 100. That's a meaningful single-step move, and the subscore breakdown gives a clear picture of where the strength is concentrated — and where caution is still warranted.

The Growth subscore sits at a perfect 100/100. That aligns directly with the underlying data: $BAM posted year-over-year revenue growth of 60.8% and year-over-year earnings growth of 47.4%. Those are not incremental improvements — they represent a step-change in the business's output, and a score move of this size almost certainly reflects that acceleration getting fully priced into the model.

The Quality subscore backs that up at 96/100. A net margin of 48.9% and return on equity of 26.8% are genuinely high-quality figures for a financial services firm. When both growth and quality fire at the same time, composite scores tend to move sharply, which is exactly what happened here.

Get the ACCE weekly digest
Index returns, picks recap, score movers - every Sunday. No fluff.

Momentum sits at 56/100 — middling. The stock's 1-year return is -13.9%, so price momentum is working against the composite score rather than amplifying it. Had momentum been stronger, the score could have moved even higher.

What it means

The 12-point score move is real, but the full picture has some tension in it worth noting.

The Value subscore is 36/100. At a trailing P/E of 30.0 and a forward P/E of 28.2, the market is pricing in continued strong execution. The analyst consensus target of $57.19 sits above the current price of $52.84, implying roughly 8% upside to that target. However, ACCE's own 6-model fair value estimate comes in at $19.44 — a significant gap from the current price. That divergence between analyst targets and model-based fair value is part of why the Value subscore is as low as it is, and it's the primary reason this score move reads as positive but not unambiguous.

The earnings quality flag is also worth watching. Despite the strong headline numbers, the data marks earnings quality as concerning. That doesn't invalidate the growth figures, but it does suggest the composition of those earnings deserves scrutiny before treating the top-line beat as the whole story. The most recent quarter showed an earnings beat of essentially 0.0% against estimates, so the growth story is year-over-year rather than a surprise-driven catalyst.

The FCF yield of 2.5% and dividend yield of 3.5% provide some return floor for holders, but neither is high enough to anchor the valuation independently.

The score move to 72 reflects genuine fundamental improvement — particularly in growth and quality. The drag from value and momentum means the composite hasn't broken into the top tier yet. For the full current price and live score updates, visit acceinvestments.com/stocks/BAM.

AI-assistedHow I use AI
See the full picture, free
ACCE scores thousands of stocks across valuation models matched to each company, with fair value, conviction and the full thesis on every name. Start free, no card required.
Stocks mentioned
Share:Post on X
← Back to Blog