Every index, held together
The indices don't share a start date, so averaging their since-inception returns would compare different stretches of market. This chain-links them instead: each trading day is the equal-weight mean of whichever indices reported that day, compounded forward. Two benchmarks are shown, because they answer different questions.
| Index | Benchmark | Index | Benchmark | Excess (pts) | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACCE Cybersecurity | CIBR | +47.33% | +33.67% | +13.66 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE AI Infrastructure | AIQ | +32.45% | +24.65% | +7.80 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE Biotech Catalysts | SPY | +18.17% | +11.60% | +6.57 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE Smart Money | SPY | +6.47% | +3.22% | +3.26 | 2026-05-14 |
| ACCE Defense & Aerospace | ITA | -1.52% | -1.15% | -0.36 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE Semiconductors | SOXX | +68.13% | +69.59% | -1.46 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE Quality Compounders | SPY | -8.48% | +11.60% | -20.08 | 2026-01-01 |
| ACCE Clean Energy | ICLN | -15.67% | +5.32% | -21.00 | 2026-01-01 |
Equal-weight, daily rebalanced, chain-linked. An index contributes only from its own first NAV day, so adding one later never rewrites earlier history and retiring one simply stops it contributing — which is what a real investor would have experienced. Days an index doesn't report are the mean of the others rather than a fabricated zero. The matched benchmark composites each index against its own sector ETF identically, and is measured from official closes rather than accumulated day over day, so a single bad print can't compound. Past performance does not predict future returns.