← All Indices
// Index Comparison

ACCE Cybersecurity vs ACCE Semiconductors

Head-to-head: performance, risk profile, and constituent overlap between two ACCE indices.

US
ACCE Cybersecurity

Zero-trust adoption, cloud security, and identity protection. The cybersecurity spend cycle is structural, not cyclical.

US
ACCE Semiconductors

The full semiconductor value chain — from chip design through fabrication to equipment. Cyclical upswing meets structural AI demand.

Performance windows
PeriodACCE CybersecurityACCE SemiconductorsSpread
1M+13.0%+34.9%-21.8%
3M-1.9%+19.6%-21.5%
YTD-3.1%+33.3%-36.4%
1Y-3.1%+33.3%-36.4%
3Y-3.1%+33.3%-36.4%
5Y-3.1%+33.3%-36.4%
Inception-3.1%+33.3%-36.4%
ACCE Cybersecurity — risk
Volatility 30d+46.2%
Volatility 90d+42.2%
Sharpe 90d-0.13
Max drawdown-24.3%
Beta vs CIBR0.94
ACCE Semiconductors — risk
Volatility 30d+39.1%
Volatility 90d+36.9%
Sharpe 90d2.59
Max drawdown-13.9%
Beta vs SOXX2.09
Constituent overlap
0 stocks held by both indices (out of 5 and 11)
Top sectors — ACCE Cybersecurity
Technology100.0%
Top sectors — ACCE Semiconductors
Technology100.0%
ACCE Verdict
ACCE Semiconductors has crushed ACCE Cybersecurity since inception, delivering 33.28% returns versus cybersecurity's -3.14% loss, a gap of over 36 percentage points. Semiconductors also presents a superior risk profile with a 2.59 Sharpe ratio compared to cybersecurity's negative -0.13, despite running slightly higher volatility at 37% versus 42%. Both indices tap into structural technology trends, but semiconductors captures the full value chain from design to fabrication while cybersecurity focuses narrowly on zero-trust and cloud security solutions. The semiconductor index carries significantly higher beta at 2.09 versus 0.94, reflecting its amplified market sensitivity, though this has worked in investors' favor during the AI boom. Semiconductors suits aggressive growth investors willing to stomach cyclical swings for exposure to the AI infrastructure buildout. The superior Sharpe ratio and shallower maximum drawdown of 13.9% versus 24.3% make it the clear winner for risk-adjusted returns. Cybersecurity appeals to defensive tech investors seeking lower beta exposure, but the negative returns and poor risk metrics suggest this structural theme hasn't yet translated into investable performance. Growth-oriented portfolios should favor semiconductors until cybersecurity spending cycles accelerate.